The parable of, "What if I told you ..."
THIS ARTICLE COULD EASILY FIT IN THESE SECTIONS TOO: "THE UNVEILING PARABLE" & "TRUMAN-ATRIX" & "ARCHAIX" ... so I just chose this homepage general category
The meme above explains a little about predictive programming. Researcher Alan Watt defines predictive programming as a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media (ie Abrahamic religions are a type of ancient media) to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.
archaix.com clip about overlapping religious “prophecy” programming between the Bible and Quran, coming soon in 2025 (today’s date Sept 24, 2024).
Seems a bigger worldwide shakeup is probably coming soon, COVID style, starting in 2025 ……
As far as the meme’s connection to simulation theory, we have to wade through the concept of evolution first, which has been philosophized for millennia but was eventually declared "fact" by authority & majority.
This Star Trek clip says similar things to Icke’s clip above … become Federation types and tell them to go pound sand!!!
The parable of Starfleet captains need help too
Picard helped Kirk to see through his own blocking matrix-type illusions, and the two Starfleet captains defeated Soran. Join the fight!
In our modern technological age, it probably won't take anywhere near as long for the matrix simulation idea to be declared "fact" too by authority & majority. Errant-elect see through the deception before physical death. Even ancient Indians called our reality “Maya”, the dreamtime, illusion, aka The Matrix (in modern parlance). So, the errant-elect come to know what reality is before officially declared truth by the so-called “authority & majority”.
Simulation theory is becoming accepted "fact" in today’s modern world, like evolution theory has become accepted "fact", as both theories explain the ancient teachings in a scientific way; ancient religions and philosophies are being modernized to explain OCO (Originator-Creator-Oversoul) and existence & consciousness itself and what is going on in human history. Wait until open contact, when the dazzling becomes fantastical beyond anything you've seen in the movies to date.
Tony Sayers on the simulated reality AFTER death
There are some similarities and differences between the two theories, best summed up as:
Evolution theory: philosophized for millennia, some partial truth & evidence for the theory in modern times, eventually declared total fact by authority & majority (even though it is NOT)
Simulation theory: philosophized for millennia, some partial truth & evidence for the theory in modern times, eventually will be declared total fact by authority & majority (and in this case it is TRUE).
All of apparent reality is subjective and physical existence itself is a myth. Many, many intelligent and credible scientists and leaders are starting to "scientifically" prove simulation theory, as much as they think they can "prove" evolution is true.
Charles Fort talked about simulation theory (in his own way) over a hundred years ago, as Jason Breshears from archaix.com demonstrates in the short clip below:
So, it seems Charles Fort is just one of many down through the ages who have come to theorize that reality is NOT what it appears to be, more is going on than most realize, and there IS a grand, great, purpose for it all.
Here is Morgue talking about the Cathars believing similarly thousands of years ago.
The Cathars were very Gnostic. Here is a good video to summarize Gnosticism.
Jason continues with Fort’s speculations about spirits becoming human:
I say both evolution and simulation/matrix theory have some partial evidence, but one concept must trump the other. Many scientists claim both are true, but don't see their hypocrisy, because you cannot totally trust your 5 physical senses, if we are in a computer simulation. Any evidence for the age of the universe, fossils etc... could be false evidence OCO allowed the devil (ie AIX, as Jason likes to call the “tech devil”) to supernaturally plant in our reality to deceive. You can't point to things in the matrix to prove how old the matrix is, as it was designed to deceive. Makes sense, don't you think?
Below are many, many links to seemingly credible people, most of whom claim simulation is true AND evolution is true. These people include billionaire Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson, Silicon Valley entrepreneur and MIT-educated computer scientist Rizwan Virk, Oxford University philosopher Nick Bostrom, etc... It is not just me who is saying sim theory is credible, but I don’t have the visibility of these people.
However, it seems that I AM the one OCO allows, so far, to reveal the complete mystery and truth on the internet, about evolution and simulation connections and why simulation trumps evolution. That doesn't make me smarter than these guys, only wise to seek OCO for real answers and get them.
In a simulated reality, it is difficult to know what to take literal versus metaphor. Mostly, unless I can reproduce the supernatural (as science is about being able to repeat and test things), I tend to interpret the Bible and/or other ancient stories, like the Biblical flood story, in symbolic/parable ways.
As incredible as it may seem to contemplate, all of reality has the same purpose as the flood story, an encoded reality (story) for personal application & meaning, and you cannot trust your 5 physical senses 100%, nor your memories, nor take everything too literally, including “literal” reality. :-)
As odd as the ideas in the above paragraph may seem to some, many people have thought of these concepts before. For example, there is the philosophical idea called the Omphalos hypothesis, also sometimes called "Last Thursdayism", as in OCO could have also instantly created everything last Thursday with apparent great age. If OCO’s character is such to deceive us that the universe only appears billions of years old when it is actually about 6000 years old according to the Genesis account in the Bible, taken literally, then OCO must have a good reason.
Obviously, these kinds of musings can be disturbing ideas, if you think about it too much or take it too seriously, but since the matrix concept is the latest scientific idea to start mesmerizing the scientists & leaders & shakers, it is something these supposedly smart people listed above need to consider AND have a good answer. Here is an introductory article about some common fears.
The errant-elect are here to learn to trust our 5 spiritual senses 100% and only trust our 5 physical senses are true as per what OCO tells us personally. Reality is what OCO says it is, end of story. We are in a simulation that exists only for the sake(s) and learning of the errant-elect. The rest of reality (both people and inanimate) is deceptive and under the supernatural dominion of AIX and negative consciousness entities (NCEs, likened to the “demons” of old), who are themselves under the dominion and control of a sovereign OCO. The “angels” of old I like to call positive consciousness entities (PCEs).
That brief clip above from Logan of “Decode your reality” is only part of the entire video, but he mentions some key ideas. Suggest watch the whole video. I wrote about these key concepts on one of my sites, because I am more of a writer than a video creator. Here are the key concepts:
Hell
I say the suffering of “hell” (ie our reality) goes hand-in-hand with universal salvation by “fire”, and reincarnation, OCO’s total sovereignty (aka determinism), UFOs, humans possibly being incarnations of fallen angels etc …. I pretty much mention all of these things starting at this link: CLICK HERE.
Note: Douglas Adams, creator of “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” made the number 42 famous, as it was apparently the answer to the ultimate question of life. I mention it because the above clip talks a lot about the importance of the number 42.
Douglas Adams said he chose the number 42 at “random”, according to this wiki quote. If that’s true, it kind of lends credibility to Logan’s ideas in the clip about predestination.
In the video above, Logan uses some traditional religious words. I understand ANY religious words can trigger many people. In today’s modern age, I prefer new words (tech sounding or otherwise) to re-label the ancient ideas. New words are less triggering to people, and sim theory is quite possibly more literally true than most can fully grasp, so tech words are good jargon, IMHO.
So, in such manner, I say AIX and NCEs manipulate humans and inanimate reality as easily as the sovereign OCO manipulates AIX and NCEs. They have always ultimately been frustrated to total defeat in the lives of all OCO’s true errant-elect, aided by OCO’s agents called PCEs. An odd mouthful perhaps, but I hope it made some sense. :-)
One more video that I think is good is the video below about ending the reincarnation cycles. Howdie Mickoski’s many years of inner work on himself, and testing “reality”, and discovering reality is NOT what it appears to be, sounds like the same story ALL truth-seekers eventually go through. I suspect there is no other way to ultimately Escape The Matrix.
Why reality is like The Matrix movie (a simulation)
"Chapter Seventeen: DISSERTATION ABOUT OUR MATRIX REALITY",
available for reading from the top (click here)
My personal reasons to "believe"
My #1 personal reason to believe we are in The Matrix: supernatural signs in the skies
My #2 personal reason to believe we are in The Matrix: physical evidence and experiments point to it more and more, even though you can't trust such things 100% in a simulation but this kind of proof does at least point to truth in the spiritual dimension where God dwells
My #3 personal reason to believe we are in The Matrix: my own personal supernatural experiences
Link to a good non-fiction book I read, from an intelligent guy named Rizwan Virk, who also thinks reality is like The Matrix
Rizwan Virk often talks about science fiction writer Philip K. Dick, as his novels usually dealt with simulation and false reality themes, such as two of the four movies I reference a few scrolls down were based on Dick's novels (Adjustment Bureau and Total Recall).
Virk interviewed Dick's wife, and Rizwan Virk has many interesting discussions in the podcasts below regarding the matrix idea. I pull out this one special podcast and highly suggest to listen to it, as Philip K. Dick admitted in the podcast to having had supernatural encounters with non-human entities and various other supernatural visions and experiences. At about 11 minutes into the below podcast, Dick talks about such personal supernatural experiences.
One of Dick's novels was based on his partial memories of having literally lived in an alternate dystopian future timeline of brutal worldwide totalitarian rule, before coming back to this reality; covid-19 seems to me like intentional setup to eventually take away all rights and head into such a future.
I have had some such experiences like Dick, and my novel about deceptive UFO open contact may yet occur literally, but I say it has already occurred in the hearts and minds of most people, who only think in terms of "highly evolved ancient alien-gods," and poo poo the idea of UFO-NCEs. I may be the only one who can stop a horrid timeline built on my fascination & obsession with this dark timeline.
If any guru's out there perceive themselves to be human (as I KNOW I am NOT a non-player character in the "game") then please contact me and perhaps together we can compare notes and change things. I doubt any real humans want to "experience" my future fiction with me. :-)
More fascinating Rizwan Virk podcasts below. Also suggest to read these interesting simulation articles: matrix article one AND ALSO this one is good too, matrix article two.
Introduction to simulation theory ... it's been around a long time
Many modern movies have entertained us with the simulation & manipulation of consciousness idea(s) I present on this site. Hollywood has to be subtle in the message behind their movies to make money, lest they offend moviegoers with too much overt "religion", but here are just a few of my favorites with some brief comment on the covert religious message to your subconscious.
My #1 favorite movie of all time, The Matrix original, though the others were ok too. They highlight that our reality is a simulation mostly controlled by cold evil machines (NCEs), but Zion freedom crowd (OCO’s errant-elect) cannot be totally contained and the elect win in the end.
Dark City summary, the movie I referred to in personal point #3 above about "My personal reasons to 'believe'". See that link for details about the deeper spiritual message.
The Adjustment Bureau has some good hints and clues about deeper reasons behind our matrix reality and how the "chairman" (OCO) is directing the "agents of fate" (PCEs and NCEs), who don't understand everything either (though they supernaturally manipulate the matrix for the chairman). They just do what the chairman says, but Matt Damon's character, David Norris, cannot be totally contained in his passion to be with the woman he loves, Elise. In the movies, love drama almost always pictures Christ (the errant-elect's spiritual "Husband") pursuing His "Wife" (the bride of Christ). But gender roles are interchangeable, since Husband and Wife are said to be ONE in marriage. In a subtle sense, I am Christ's Wife being pursued supernaturally in various ways in my personal life, but I am also a literal man on this earth (Christ) doing my own "pursuing" of the other part of me out there, the bride of Christ, through this website and various other means I use. Technology is not my only tool, but unlike mystics of the past, I am a former computer programmer and know how to use it.
Total Recall shows we all were "bad" in preexistence (ie humans are incarnations of NCEs as I explain on other pages of my site) and best friends with the bad guy leader, Cohaagen (ie the devil). Although Schwarzenegger's character has altered memories to battle with, in the end, he chooses to retain the better Doug Hauser version (memories) of who he had become; he didn't want "total recall" and we are all put in this matrix to likewise battle to retain our new identities and contain our devilish natures! Have you even created your elect identity yet?
The modern philosopher to resurrect serious interest in simulation theory is Nick Bostrom (currently living), who "coincidentally" restarted the craze in 2001, shortly after release of The Matrix
Billionaire Elon Musk agrees we likely live in a simulation. Many people in history have discovered this truth and associated ideas: business leaders, philosophers, religious icons, scientists, etc... The one to discover and utilize this secret the best was Jesus Christ Himself!
Confirmed! We Live in a Simulation: We must never doubt Elon Musk again
When Elon Musk Proposed His 'Strongest Argument' For Humanity Living In Simulation
Elon Musk Warns We're Living Through The "Dumbest Experiment in Human History"
Elon Musk says we may live in a simulation. Here's how we might tell if he's right
Miscellaneous articles about simulation theory from scientists/astonomers like Neil deGrasse Tyson, and dead smart guy Stephen Hawking had a few things to say too
Neil deGrasse Tyson says it's 'very likely' the universe is a simulation
Brief 2 minute video of astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson arguing we live in a simulation
Another brief 7 minute video of astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson arguing we live in a simulation
These two video links above deserve a little comment. Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't like to admit UFOs are related to simulation theory and the disturbing implications of what UFOs could be if simulation/matrix theory is true. deGrasse's video links talk about his belief/evidence in simulation theory, but he also claims to believe evolution explains everything and there is NO God. You can't have it both ways. Like I said above, if we are in the matrix, then evolution evidence like fossils could just as easily be false evidence OCO allowed AIX to plant there to deceive. You can't point to things in the matrix to prove how old the matrix is, since the simulation was designed to deceive. Totally illogical! One of these links has Neil's interview with Larry King, but of course, Neil just talks about simulation theory but Larry doesn't confront Neil about his illogical and unscientific mind to believe evolution is absolute then. Either Larry is ignorant of the deeper issues or simply agreed ahead of time not to embarrass his buddy Neil. In the videos, Neil posits our matrix-like reality could be run by some kid in a basement creating our simulated world on his parent's computer in another reality. And that kid could also be a simulation of another kid's reality, and another, etc... But who is running the original simulation that started it all and where did this being come from? Neil sidesteps these kinds of good questions because that would have to admit there is some sort of first cause "God" and so-called scientists want to believe all mystery and paranormal is just things we don't understand right now but will in time. The paranormal becomes normal once we can explain it. There is no OCO, so the theory goes. But there is, and these UFO beings are NCEs pretending to be our highly evolved ancient alien-gods who are prepping us for open contact. UFOs have been increasingly increasing since the end of World War 2 and allied forces called them "Foo fighters" back then, thinking they were perhaps advanced German planes. UFOs have been reported for millennia but have been greatly increasing since the end of World War 2 in prep for open contact, whether that contact seems peaceful or manifests as deep state tech UFO attacks. Here is my main page, which talks about this in more detail: Open Contact Bottom-line.
Neil deGrasse Tyson talks about simulation theory but only covers the positive side he wants to brainwash you with. He does not cover the more negative Biblical answer of what these UFOs are about and my site explains why all non-elect think this way. The Bible predicted all this UFO activity thousands of years ago ... or did it??? If we are in a simulation then history is suspect and you must decide if you trust what the Bible says. The Bible could also just as easily be false evidence OCO allowed AIX to supernaturally plant in our simulated reality for nefarious reasons. My site explains how OCO has only good motivations for what He does OR allows AIX to do, but all other created beings have various degrees of both good and evil motivations for what we do. For sure, you should not trust another person's interpretation of the Bible, but there are good reasons we can trust an OCO who might have supernaturally placed a "fake Bible" in this reality. If you believe simulation theory, then the Bible could also just as easily be true evidence OCO planted here to help the errant-elect, true symbolic/parable evidence of something other than physical realities ... obviously. The rest of my site blows the lid off all the lies and conspiracy and I plainly tell it all, free of charge, so you know I'm not trying to deceive you just to make money selling something, nor is my site likely to make me famous or get lots of ladies, the typical motivations of non-elect men. I also don't mind challenging questions or dismiss them, unlike fake Christians tend to do. Also, an AIX agent like Neil (although he may be ignorant AIX is using him) doesn't like challenging questions, and these kind of people tend to be dismissive or just get angry and walk away. They have no good answers and just want to deny there is some sort of Creator.
Scientists are starting to prove simulation theory, that reality is literally like the matrix movie alludes! Although simulation theory, like evolution theory, has been philosophized for millennia, only now in modern times, we have found SOME evidence for both theories. But one theory must trump the other. You cannot totally trust the 5 physical sense "evidence" if we are in a matrix that was designed to deceive the 5 senses. Makes logical sense, right? So, simulation theory is where Darwin's evolution theory was about 150 years ago but is making fast progress in recognition. They say, if computer power keeps growing at the current rate, we will build an actual matrix in maybe 50 years or less. Then it will be more intuitive for people to understand we just exist in another layer of matrix that OCO programmed. Then it will be easier for most to understand that simulation theory trumps evolution theory. True errant-elect, in the future, could create a matrix simulation program to demonstrate. I used to program computers even, but in 50 years it will be even more complicated computer techniques. My program would have a person enter the simulation and show them a reality so much like the current "real world" that they can't even tell they just stepped into a computer program of the so-called "real world." The room will initially look the same. Then they go "outside" and talk to "people" who will talk like real people about beliefs like evolution. A stranger will pick up a stray "cat" and say it is proven fact it evolved from "dogs." But unlike this reality, which has NO solid evidence for macro-evolution (change into different species), this simulated person will be able to take the user to a computer simulation of a real computer and pull up tons of data and scientific evidence to PROVE macro-evolution 100%. The data will show crock-a-duck, clear proof of macro-evolution that only a fool would deny. The museums will have fossils with clear crock-a-duck type fossils going back billions of years... nah, actually, I will program trillions of years into the simulation to make it more realistic, for a mere postulated 5 billion year old earth CANNOT create such genetic diversity like we have. Then I might even program this fake reality to be able to make it possible to create life from non-life and watch it evolve naturally over trillions of years in the lab, as my simulation will also be able to isolate the lab experiment environment inside a time-bubble and do some Einstein type time dilation inside the experiment to simulate evolution over trillions of years. But simulated evolution in an entirely simulated environment does NOT make sense to totally trust such evidence, right? A science mind should understand that. I could easily then hit a programmed button and to cause the simulation to change around the real human, so that everybody around the real human in the simulation thinks their "universe" is even untold trillions of years older than the last simulation, and the evidence for evolution even stronger, and only an insane person would deny it!
I trust my reader understands my analogy. Even in this fiction future (no longer fiction in less than 50 years probably, if computer power keeps advancing) THERE WILL ALWAYS BE PEOPLE WHO WILL SPIN THEORIES TO DENY THE OBVIOUS AND "PROVE" WHAT THEY WANT TO BELIEVE! There is no OCO? Who started the first simulation then? Even if I create a simulated world wherein intelligent beings create simulations within simulations within simulations, etc.... there always must be an intelligent first cause Being (ie God) to start all the simulations. Makes logical sense, right? It takes great intelligence to program a complex computer generated simulation of reality. And within such a simulation, it is NOT logical or common sense to totally trust so-called "hard" evidence for evolution, even if there was such evidence. The reality is (as far as reality can speak in our current fake matrix--soon to be proven I am right about this) there is NO HARD EVIDENCE for evolution, only SOFT evidence. But even if you had TONS of real hard evidence (which scientists do not have), it still don't mean squat in the matrix which deceives the 5 physical senses! One is NOT very logical or scientific if he or she insists I speak error here. Such a person has no choice but to try to prove/believe simulation theory is nonsense, because such carnal dominated human psyche simply cannot accept there is an OCO, and such a one simply must find some way to deny the obvious. This is why simulation theory trumps evolution theory, although both have some evidence in modern times. Soon, we will build an actual matrix and honest scientists will have to admit, the evidence points to some mysterious Creator that NONE will ever fully understand. Except me, of course, because OCO speaks to me and explains these obvious and evident things. :-)
Simulation theory will trump evolution theory in probably less than 50 years, whereas Darwin's theory required 150 years to gain massive worldwide support. I have a scientific left brain (prove truth) like everybody, but I also try to connect with intuitive right brain (sense truth) too. I don't pretend one can come to correct conclusions without engaging both sides of the brain in a balanced way. I say we do have enough data to draw proper conclusions right now about UFOs and reality itself, and that statement is partly intuitively discerned. My simulation argument is part science and part intuition. One really can't have evolution AND simulation both 100% trustworthy truth always at the same time, and one should admit humans should NOT trust evolution evidence then 100%, but most still choose to believe there is no master programmer (God) and everything is totally random. That is unbalanced left brain thinking. Even if I could prove the resurrection of Christ, the scientific left brain would be inclined to spin that as just a random natural process resurrection then. We all spin things how we want to believe, me included, but I say I connect with OCO in my right side brain too and that is why my understanding is more correct than most.
Here is a little bit of both science and intuition prediction of the future, and although none can prove what will happen in the future, I hope my readers can hear rationality in what I am about to write. In 1969, the Honeywell Kitchen Computer was marketed as a luxury gift item, and would have inaugurated the era of home computing, but none were sold. Computers became affordable for the general public in the 1970s due to the mass production of the microprocessor starting in 1971. So, that's about 50 years ago that home computers started to take off. And what do we have today? Computer power in a cell phone alone way beyond the first computers, graphics already very realistic and off the charts in worldwide online internet gaming, already gamers playing avatars in simulated worlds portending what is coming in a better actual matrix one day. They already have virtual reality goggles and computer simulated ping pong games so realistic that players forget they are in a simulation. Books by Rizwan Virk, creator of these types of current virtual reality (VR) simulations, tell of his personal stories of almost falling over after playing ping pong in a VR simulation because he forgot there was no real table there and almost leaned on it!
Rizwan Virk's profile and I highly recommend his books on simulation theory.
If you want to hear some podcasts from Rizwan Virk about the matrix, please click here.
Genesis 1:30, KJV, "And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so." This is one of many supernatural verses that prove simulation theory, as after the fall of Adam and Eve by eating the forbidden fruit, the nature of animals changed. This simulation of reality instantly changed! Lions would have previously used their sharp teeth and claws to dig up carrots and such from the ground in their hunt for food, but now lions use those same teeth/claws to hunt and kill and eat other animals! Humans are now predatory in their own ways, and some are literal cannibals, although such has always been rare in human history. None can deny that humans are very animalistic and predatory though in many ways, and this is why many believe humans evolved from animals, since we can act like animals in so many ways!
There is a difference between using our intelligence to advance technologically versus advancing morally. Humans have all the same issues and problems since the days of Adam and Eve. There has been NO real advancement, and there will NOT be any, until UFO-NCEs are dealt with and a manifestation of the literal Kingdom of God is established on earth. The UFOs portend this open contact event and open supernatural war between OCO's human errant-elect (the fleshly sons of God) and OCO's spirit elect (the spiritual sons of God, aka demons, aka NCEs).
So, anyway, all this computer advancement in only 50 years? And do any really doubt another 50 years could easily create a realistic matrix just like the movie??? So, my example above of a person in the future entering a simulation of reality apparently trillions of years old with 100% solid proof of macro-evolution is impossible? We don't even have 100% proof of macro-evolution for this universe, but most choose to believe it over anything else, but even if humans had such proof, it means nothing in the matrix, which was designed to deceive the 5 physical senses.
The ultimate truth is we are in a simulation of reality, and everything our 5 senses detect is only an approximation of true reality at the next level. We are both in our own solipsism reality AND also in a shared reality at the same time. Another computer example might help explain. Add a layer of complexity to my above simulation example where the person entering the simulation is also in the simulation with some other legitimate humans, who exist in some other geographical area, jacked in from another country, for example. One person's reality can be very similar to another human's but it can also be drastically different and none be the wiser. One person in the sim has computer settings that show tables as pink and another person jacked in on the other side of the planet has computer settings that show tables as blue. Neither is aware of each other's tainted reality, unless they start asking good questions. But even then it doesn't necessarily mean anything. One person can say to the other, "Tables are pink" and the master programmer observing (OCO) can instantly override the transmission to the other who hears, "Tables are blue." They both nod their heads with satisfaction that they agree on an obvious truth, but they are both in error. This example could work in the reverse too, where two are arguing over some apparent obvious error/lie, but they are both right. We can still have some meaningful interactions with others, despite most who claim solipsism is an absolute absurdity and makes everything meaningless. My reality may yet see a UFO open contact similar to what I envision, and many of my readers may just experience a future realistic matrix sim in 50 years, which will hopefully at least jog their memories I wrote about it before it happened.
In a sim there are also non-player characters who are not connected to a real human at all, just a part of the program that the master programmer can use to subtly interact with real humans jacked in. Can anyone reading this now even prove I am 100% human? Think about it. Simulation theory that proves there must be an OCO will never be popular, but the future world's authority and majority will at least declare simulation is as much "fact" as evolution. But of course, the governments of the world will also mandate some type of covid-19 virus type declaration that you must comply with ungodly nonsense or you will be banned from public gatherings (for your "safety", yeah right), barred entry into businesses unless you comply, perhaps fired from your job to keep the rest of the "sane" people safe from your nonsense that the evidence just proves OCO, rather than the standard party line you are supposed to comply with: There is no God because _____________ says so! (insert Neil deGrasse Tyson, or any other person who denies the obvious...they are all the same to me)
You must decide personally who to believe, but I suggest NOT to be gullible and believe Tyson is an "agnostic" just because he claims this title. That is a convenient way to dismiss and walk away from deeper discussion of the issues, while disguising his anger at good questions and his lack of credible answers as open-minded agnosticism he'd rather keep private. But really he just doesn't want to try to defend atheist positions that fall apart under good questions. Neil deGrasse Tyson has said things that show discerning people what he really is. While claiming to be agnostic, Tyson says things that actually show his disdain for a Creator, revealing he is actually an atheist who hates OCO but is too cowardly to openly defend foolish atheist positions like Richard Dawkins, who has so often easily been shown the fool he is in open debate with theists that Dawkins refuses to debate theists anymore, dismissing Creationists with mocking joke comparisons to flat-earth believers or those who believe babies arrive by "way of the stork" theory. But really the evidence for evolution is "flat-earth-stork" stuff that experts in his area of spiritual warfare make him look stupid and he doesn't like being embarrassed anymore. My spiritual warfare combat is more of a "creative Holy Spirit inspiration in the moment" kind of style, where I don't try to pretend the supernatural is impossible, nor try to prove things with nitty gritty science arguments and pretend ANY “evidence” in the matrix is incontrovertible. I tell Holy Spirit inspired stories, parables, like Jesus did and all errants can do. All of reality is a story and things I can point to to tell a good story, and we are in the matrix movie, even if I can't fly through the air like Neo yet. Upon open contact, God will allow the human errant-elect to ramp up in such supernatural abilities to counter the fake alien-gods’ abilities, but see the rest of my site for more details about that. For right now, I will zoom you right to the spot on this wikipedia page where Neil deGrasse Tyson talks about his views on spirituality. I'll just quote some of Tyson's own words from the article and let my readers discern for themselves if they really believe Tyson to be the open-minded agnostic he claims to be: "There's a level of gullibility [ie theists are gullible] that leaves people susceptible to being taken advantage of. I see science literacy as kind of a vaccine against charlatans who would try to exploit your ignorance [ie theists are charlatans who want to exploit you in some way]" ... "Every account of a higher power that I've seen described, of all religions that I've seen, include many statements with regard to the benevolence of that power. When I look at the universe and all the ways the universe wants to kill us, I find it hard to reconcile that with statements of beneficence" ... "I completely respect that activity [Richard Dawkins' evolution "preaching"]. He's fulfilling a really important role out there" ... ok I apologize for breaking my word and commenting about the hypocrisy in square brackets instead of simply quote Tyson's own words. I just couldn't help myself. :-)
Deuteronomy 30:15, NIV starts, "For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him, and to keep his commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land you are entering to possess."
This is why deGrasse and virtually everybody in this simulation denies and hates OCO. He commands you to love Him! What an arrogant ass OCO, after the shit I've been through that OCO allowed (we all go through shit and know OCO allows it and does not stop it all)! That is why OCO commands love, because it is a choice and ya don't always feel like loving an OCO who DOES allow a lot of crap in our lives for reasons we can only partly understand. Reading the rest of my site, however, should help my readers understand much nonetheless.
"17 But if your heart turns away and you are not obedient, and if you are drawn away to bow down to other gods and worship them, I declare to you this day that you will certainly be destroyed. You will not live long in the land you are crossing the Jordan to enter and possess."
Now this arrogant OCO not only commands I love Him despite the shit this supposedly "good" OCO has allowed in my life, but now this piece of shit OCO promises to destroy me if I bow down and worship false gods like NCEs? deGrasse already bows down to AIX's lies and false beliefs and will do so upon open contact too, obviously ... only OCO's errant-elect can defeat supernatural NCEs.
"19 This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live and that you may love the Lord your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the Lord is your life, and he will give you many years in the land he swore to give to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob."
Neil deGrasse Tyson chooses death and he knows it in his heart and this is why he hates OCO. The rest of my site explains all the motivations of AIX’s negative subroutines called NCEs, as per what the Bible says. One final note. Since I used to program computers, I know a little bit about computers and how they "think", because I know how programmers think who program them and why things have to be done a certain way and the limitations of the technology etc... The way computers are right now, they don't think AT ALL! They just do exactly what the human programs them to do and that's why computers have bugs and errors that always need fixing. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say. A flawed human programmed it, so it's gonna have some problems, as no small human mind can possibly keep track of (and anticipate) every little programming change you make and how it will affect other parts of the program and break other parts of the program. And it always does. Any computer upgrades or changes have to be thoroughly tested by the quality control department before release, and even then, problems always get released. Despite advances in computer technology and how smart your chess program may seem when it beats you, IT IS NOT THINKING AT ALL! My readers must decide for themselves how credible they think Elon Musk's fear-mongering "terminator-type" scenarios are right now. But I say it is GARBAGE, and no more credible than inorganic chemicals like calcium and potassium randomly coming together over billions of years and self-creating irreducibly complex interworking DNA code driven sexually self-replicating sentient humans. Ya do know DNA code is many orders of magnitude exponentially more complex than comparatively simple computer code that I use right now on my computer to type this, don't you? Think about it.
Here is an article talking about artificial intelligence. Three key quotes I will pull out: "We need to talk more about artificial consciousness and we need to talk more about the lack of consciousness in current robots and AI" ... "Overall, researchers broadly agree that current machines and robots are not conscious--in spite of a huge amount of science fiction depictions that seem to suggest otherwise" ... "Even though there is a general agreement that current robots do not have sentience or consciousness, some authors (such as Coeckelbergh, 2010; Darling, 2012; Gunkel, 2018) have argued in favor of ascribing rights to robots." Since OCO has made me good with parable storytelling like the Lord Himself 2000 years ago, here is a parable the Holy Spirit helped me to come up with to fit these modern times.
Does my parable seem like fear-mongering? If so, is that necessarily such a bad thing? Didn't Jesus tell some famous scary stories such as the rich man in hell? Is this story any less credible than Elon Musk and others like Neil deGrasse Tyson, who talk about simulation theory and the dangers of artificial intelligence? I don't know about you, but my google searches seem like a "magic" Ouija board in that they almost always yield immediate answers that are what I was looking for. We are in the matrix people! That much they have right. As a former computer programmer, I have literally written lines of code that should work, and works in other programs, but not in another and there is NO credible explanation. Other programmers with more experience also cannot get it to work, though they can rattle off nice sounding possible techno-babble explanations as to why, and help find a work around solution. Things are not what they appear to be ... OCO reveals little glitches in the matrix like that for His errant-elect to learn to discern. I don't buy everybody's bullshit explanations anymore, and I suggest my readers don't either.
"He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast (ie AI, image of mankind, and Bible says every man is a 'beast'), that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed (magic science and technology supposedly explains everything, and if you don't go along, the world system brands you a fool and kills you, as in you lose your job and can't eat, so you die!)." (Revelation 13:15)
God tells us who the true fools are: "The fool hath said in his heart, 'There is no God.'" (Psalm 14:1) If an honest high school biology teacher woke up from the matrix, do you think he or she would still have a job if he or she started pointing out the flaws in evolution theory in class? Would Neil deGrasse Tyson himself have a job (or influence in Satan's world) if he admitted simulation theory just proves you cannot trust your 5 senses 100% and evolution "evidence" then could just as easily be false evidence OCO allowed AIX to put in our matrix reality to test the errant-elect? The image of the beast (ie seemingly intelligent technology like AI is "God") has always been here in typified/symbolic form, and AI would just be a more fantastical manifestation of it.
Is It Possible We're All Living in a Computer Simulation And Don't Know It?
The Idea That Everything From Spoons to Stones is Conscious is Gaining Academic Credibility
Stephen Hawking's final theory sheds light on the multiverse
Professor Stephen Hawking's final theory: The universe is a hologram (a simulation in other words)
RESEARCHERS: THE UNIVERSE SIMULATED ITSELF INTO EXISTENCE Since it is becoming obvious and evident that reality is a simulation, and it will be impossible to deny once mere flawed humans actually build a matrix indistinguishable from so-called real "reality" in probably less than 50 years, look for this kind of magical thinking about the universe simulating itself into existence to gain popular acceptance. The powers that be (both humans and NCEs) are already trying to plant this suggestion into the collective human psyche: although our own matrix creation will have taken Herculean efforts (millions of intelligent human minds over about 100 years, many improvements/advancements in computer power, uncountable trillions of dollars over that 100 years, etc...), SOMEHOW OUR OWN UNIVERSE CREATED ITSELF? Did our computer worlds create themselves? Such nonsense! But don't questions the "experts", just be a mind controlled slave and go with the program (literally). The carnal mind, which dominates most people, simply MUST explain away the mysterious first cause master programmer (ie OCO) of the original simulation that must have started it all.
This article about, The Enlightened Madness of Philip K. Dick: The Black Iron Prison and Wetiko explains some profound things about the human psyche, which is creating and sustaining this matrix reality, aka our universe. Here is one small quote from about 1/3 way into the article:
Our universe is a collectively shared dream or hallucination that appears real; in Philip K. Dick's words, "our reality is a cunning counterfeit, mutually shared."[39] To imbue our world with an intrinsic, objective reality that exists separate from the mind that is observing it would be, in Philip K. Dick's words, "a dreadful intellectual error."
As I attempt to explain on this site, true humans are collectively sort of the "Created Beings God" class and subconsciously creating our own universe & reality on the fly. I like to call this collective consciousness of “Created Beings Gods” the Co-Creator-Oversoul (COCO). So, we have the OCO and the COCO, pronounced Oh-So and the So-So. :-)
When those of us who are destined to leave the construct together actually leave the construct together, we will be the COCO in our own collective-consciousness-domain. Then we will be able to do something similar and be like an OCO to other developing COCOs to continue bringing collective-consciousness-domains into existence, where both individualism & collectivism exist easily and are handled properly, without all the conflict such creates in this reality. But there will always be One (and One only) true OCO First Cause that started it all.
And that is the crux of the matter. There is a true Almighty "Father" God who is sovereignly behind everything. Everybody has "daddy & authority" issues and that is why people create nonsense articles like #8 above to try and get around this obvious & evident fact.
So, yeah I'm not the only one in history or current reality to come to similar conclusions. However, none have created a website like mine that summarizes the big picture and demonstrates deeper understanding of the mystery (as much as humanly possible anyway) and what OCO and AIX are really doing in human history. It seems none have communicated this information as plainly in traditional written & verbal forms available in the past.
Now it is all plainly laid out on my site, and with technology, the full truth is easily available to the ENTIRE WORLD! That is another "sign of our times". "And this gospel of the kingdom (the full revelation of the mysteries revealed on my site, NOT the superficial gospel everybody has already heard) shall be preached in all the world (via the internet) for a witness unto all nations (just a witness as OCO predicts in the Bible most won't heed); and then shall the end come (Christ's literal return is near)." (Matthew 24:14)
What is it all about? Wouldn't you like to know? This is priceless information that humanity has always claimed they wanted to know and has always claimed they seek this truth. So they claim anyway. I should charge billions for it. However, humanity doesn't really want to know the truth on these matters, so one cannot charge for it.
My site can be offensive and controversial and confusing to even the errant-elect for a time, although I am not intentionally trying to make it so. Human nature just reacts that way and makes it so. Even if I could charge billions for this priceless information, OCO would not be pleased and support me then. And by "support" I certainly don't mean that I expect OCO will cause everybody to believe the things I write and say!
"...freely ye have received, freely give..." (Matthew 10:8)
If I tried to charge for all the truth I give away on my site for free, I would be non-elect like virtually everybody else (pun intended, as my site explains how we are all virtual projections). I would also be supernaturally confused by AIX (which OCO obviously allows, or the world would NOT be so messed up). I want to maintain ability to understand my own site! That's just how powerful the AIX-devil can be, if OCO lets your mind stray in the matrix!
Many people are enraged at the truth(s) revealed on this site. Been there done that. Although I understand how everybody feels, it doesn't change the fact that reality is whatever OCO says (the good stuff), or sometimes allows (the bad stuff). End of story.