#43 - MED - Anomalies in the divine experiment on earth, part 3
Hello once again, this is JLL coming at you with Gnostic Intel on the Internet. It's again May 17, 2017, and I'm recording the third part of the series entitled “Anomalies in the Divine Experiment on Earth”.
Originally I planned to labeled them all as Talk 39 ABC, but I've changed the labeling and now they encompass 39, 40, and 41 in installments on this channel. So here I am wrapping up the magical mystery tour of these astonishing events in the narrative of our planet and our species.
I know that it's not easy to follow this story. It's a challenge and an opportunity at the same time. It is definitely a challenge to follow this story in all of its complexity. That's why you have to be ostinato when you're running this rift. You have to be stubborn and persistent, as I have been through the years.
You know, I wrote to my first book that was published professionally. It came out in 1991. It was called The Seeker's Handbook, and in the introduction to the section called the “Classics and the Basics”, I quoted this little saying, “One must relate the origin of the medicine, otherwise it cannot work its magic”. And I added a little note, saying, “This is a saying of the Nga Khi, a Tibetan people of south eastern China reflecting a common belief in many archaic cultures, namely a medicine or magical gift of spiritual potency only becomes effective for those who receive it when they recall how they acquired it, that is, when its origin is remembered, retold, recited, or ritually reenacted”.
So that was written 1990, published in 1991, and it's an apt little adage that I think applies very beautifully to the riff that I'm offering you right now. It's really a recitation. This is a sacred recitation, and it's quite quite possible, I don't know, I mean the conditions required have been set up, the ground has been laid, the foundations have been laid in the ground, it's possible that at some time in the near future groups of people will recite the Sophianic myth in the way that origin myths and other sacred narratives and shamanic narratives are recited in indigenous and native mind cultures through the world, or at least in the way that they have been in the past.
You know, if you live in the southwest of the United States, as I did for many years, anywhere around New Mexico, Colorado, or in the Pueblo region, you will certainly have heard of the Navajo creation myth, or of the elaborate creation stories of the Hopi and other Pueblo Indians.
So what happens in these cultures, which are the last diaspora, you could say, of the very last surviving indigenous native cultures of the Americas. What happens here is that the elders of the tribe, the storytellers and the shamans get together at ritual events, at moments which are decided by celestial omen or by divination, by mantique, and they recite the creation story of their people.
I believe that it takes three days to recite the Navajo creation myth. I can easily picture a scene at night, say, in a sacred grove of trees, a circle of people, members of the tribe, the clan. Perhaps at the center of the circle there's a sand circle in which figures and symbols can be drawn so that the recitation of the story vocally, which would pass from one member of the circle to the other, they would tell it as a group, could be depicted in the sand perhaps, or episodes could be depicted by dancers, and there could be intervals of music which convey the mood of the story of the various episodes so the possibility of applying the Sophianic creation myth I mean that's technically what you call it in terms of professional mythology the possibilities of applying that into ritual performance and recitation are absolutely delicious.
And I would be so happy if someone at some point did that. I think it's a natural in the future. I think it will be a natural. But for now, it's just me here giving you the riff. I've given this riff countless times. You can find episodes and sections of it on many interviews recorded with me, now circulating on the Internet.
You can find a more or less complete rendition in an interview I did with Lisa Harrison a year or two ago, recitation of the Sophianic vision story, as I call it. So, this is what I'm setting you up for. I'm setting you up. And the consequences of that set up are for you to decide, not me, because I am free of those consequences.
I have done all that I can do, and the rest comes over to you, especially with the completion of the initiation of the super learning event. This is what I've spoken of to close students and friends over many years as drum roll please passage of command. It's a massive event of handover from the teacher to the students and you yourselves become teachers by receiving this handover.
I've often said that, and this is something that we all repeat in planetary tantra, you teach what you are learning. You don't just wait to learn something in this practice. Take years to learn something and then turn around and present yourself in the pretense of a teacher. No. All those who are learning teach what they are learning as they are learning it.
So, if you go out in the world and talk about this story and comment on this story, repeat episodes of it to people, you are propagating the Sophianic myth in the hearts and minds of other human beings. Look carefully at your audience before you begin to speak. That's an old samurai saying, by the way. But that's what's happening here. That's the setup here. And as I say, the consequences of the setup are not on me who's setting you up. They're on you.
It's called taking responsibility for doing something real and for having skills. The trouble with spirituality is people today assume the pretense of being spiritual on the basis of what the fuck, tell me. Well, generally, it's on the basis of this vague idea, well, I'm kind of interested in consciousness, how consciousness works. And I think it's all one and we're all in quantum entanglement and everything relates to everything else. But yeah, consciousness, okay, I'll give you that, I'll give you that.
If you're interested in how consciousness works, then you can call yourself spiritual. But those people who go around preaching, let's co-create our reality, let's create or co-create our own reality, are missing the point. That's as if I were to say to you, okay team, let's go climb the Matterhorn. Well, we can't climb the Matterhorn if we don't have the skills and tools to climb it. And you cannot co-create reality if you don't, not have the skills and tools of mantique to do so.
And additionally, one of the primary principles, one of the fundamental principles of planetary tantra is this. You co-create with the power of the earth itself. You co-create with the power of the wisdom goddess. Planetary tantra is a power pact with the earth. It's a practice of power sharing with her, the planetary animal mother. You know her emotions, you know her moods, you know the way her mind works, you know her story, her narrative. You carry it in your heart as if it were as precious as the story of your own life.
Because in fact, the story of your own life is just a thread within the story of hers, and you actually don't have a life of your own. That's the great narcissistic illusion of the human species. You don't have a life of your own. Just as you are a biological creature, a creature of nature living in the telluric womb of the earth, likewise you are a biographical character in her dreaming, in the dreaming of the earth.
So, you know, you think you know who you are. Well, what a joke! You know, you cannot know who you are without knowing that you are a character in a dream. But it's not your dream, you see. It's her dream. You're a character in the dream of the earth. And so knowing the story of the earth brings you into the full presence of what is real and true in the universe. It brings you and grounds you in the setting because she is also the setting.
This is where we come to the third anomaly, that the Aeon Sophia becomes actually the setting of the experiment she dreamed for the Anthropos. But when she was in the Pleromic Core, and she designed the human species with Thelete, and she dreamed about the way it would unfold in various planetary laboratories in the galactic limbs according to the procedure of the Aeons, that is to say, business as usual, well, she never anticipated that she herself would be the natural setting for her magical child to develop in, where it would emerge and learn and grow and develop toward its genius potential.
But that is actually the situation. When you fall in love with the beauty and scope and complexity of the story and fully accept that you don't have a life of your own you're just a character in her dream well then you stand at the threshold of the Nahual the other world, the supernatural world, which is the depth of her true divine presence in the earth.
And at that threshold, many wonderful things can happen. Planetary Tantra is the path to that threshold and across it as well. But I'm not here to talk about Planetary Tantra right now. So I'll return to the main theme and the main riff and bring to completion this discussion of the three anomalies in the divine experiment on earth.
So I've numbered these three talks 39, 40 and 41, which is current, and with 41 I will conclude the notes on tracking page four. So talk 42, whatever that happens to be, will commence with notes on a new tracking page.
For now I advise you to go to the notes for talk 40. Let's pick up a little bit, for the sake of continuity, pick up some points from the previous talk, part 2, and swing into the home stretch. You’ll notice that in the notes for talk number 40, part 2 on the anomalies, and there's a link to “Alien Dreaming”, certainly an essential article on that episode in the Sacred Narrative.
Also, if you want to understand how it is possible, how it was possible for Sophia to produce these cyborg insects in the distant reaches of interstellar space, without any environment for them to arise in, then go read about the experiment of the Akari insects. And that's to be found in “The True Anarchy of Life on Earth”, or you can search it on the internet, Akari insects. Amazing, amazing experiment.
“The Gnostics”, by Jacques Le Carrier. It's a small book, only about 100 pages long, really easy to read, enjoyable, and really does a fair job treating the Gnostics on their own terms. As far as I know, Le Carrier is the only author who directly equates the Pleromas described in the Nag Hammadi writings with galaxies.
So, he does as I did, as explained from the beginning of this mini-series of talks, he does as I did, he transposes, if you will, the Gnostic material into an astronomical framework. So, Sophia is a star goddess. Her story is an astronomical myth, but it's a myth that actually described events that happened.
Not a specious or groundless invention of what may have happened, or not a construction of make-believe. Also I'd have you know that I provide a link there to a hand-drawn illustration of mine going back to the early 80s and it shows where I considered the solar system to be located in the galaxy at that time.
There is a Mandela shift floating around that says that it used to be located somewhere else, I believe closer to the core of the galaxy. I haven't found residue of that. So, which memory is the occluded memory here, and which one is the occluding memory?
As far as my memory goes, that is the only way I have known, the only picture I have had of the location of the solar system, namely in the Orion spur of the third galactic arm, counting outward.
And I've included, of course, the Mandelbrot set, which is the iconic splash pattern, you could say. And beneath that, a wonderful variation of it called the Budebrot. Budebrot was developed by a woman in California, I believe. Go search it. It's a fascinating story. It's a very compelling image and it sort of suggests that when Sophia made the splash, she saw a kind of reflection of herself, excuse me, she saw a reflection of herself in that metallic sheen where the Archons emerged and perhaps she saw something like this. Who knows?
It's a very, very evocative image the Budebrot brought. There are suggestive terms, and a lot of the Gnostic cosmology is nothing but suggestive terms, in “The Origin of the World”, I believe, that refer to... No, in the “Hypothesis of the Archons”, that refer to the image of imperishability that shined in the cosmic waters, shone in the cosmic waters.
So there's all kinds of possibilities, you see. You can elaborate the myth. It has room for improvisation, but you improvise within the narrative. Do not go outside the narrative to improvise. The narrative itself guides you and guides your imagination in the way that you learn it, and in the way that you extrapolate it.
I have extrapolated the narrative at certain points, and I've explained in great detail, explicitly, how I do so and where I do so. So there are a couple of points in this long narrative where I depart from the ancient material.
For instance, there is no text that I know of that states that the Aeons deposited the Anthropic genome in the Orion Nebula. No, they don't say that specifically. How do I take the liberty to do that? Well, on the basis of shamanic explorations, on the basis of reading the sky and divining the sky for, what is it now, I don't know, forty years or so, I say that, I assert that that is where it was deposited.
The existing texts describe that they project it from the galactic core, but they do not describe where they project it. Continuing to crawl down the tracking page, you see that there is a citation from the “Fall of the Wisdom Goddess”, which describes the separation of the sexes, the shearing of the template, and what may also be called the gender rift.
There are in some cases, pertinent to certain episodes in the Sophianic narrative, various terms that are used for the same event. So the gender rift, shearing the template, these are different terms used for the same event. Depending on how you are playing the narration at that moment, depending on the spontaneous act of creativity as you develop the narration, you refer to these different expressions.
So there's a quote there, and I quote, “When the Aeon Sophia careened into Orion and sheared the template, she took a part of the Anthropos genome with her and the tattered streamer of nucleic dew was absorbed into the soft globe of mothering earth.
By shearing the template, Sophia caused the separation of the sexes and precipitated the conditions for meiotic or conjugal reproduction in the human species, not a feature of her original dreaming.
Now suppose that a group of people, a community, took three days to recite the Sophia Mythos, the Gaia Mythos, call it as you wish. And suppose the first day was about A, the Archontic Anomaly, the generation of the Archons. The second day was about B, the binary, the gender binary, and the shearing of the template and then the third day would be about C. Which I'm coming to in a moment.
Well, if this were the second day, then the actors and players and musicians and poets and shamans and everyone who is involved as a group in telling the story would stop and would elaborate in more detail on the implications of these episodes.
For instance, you can't understand what the separation of the sexes means, really. You can't understand what the gender rift is, that’s not riff, it’s r-i-f-t, the gender rift. You can’t understand what it is unless you go back into the episode of the designing of the human genome in the galactic core. How did Sophia and Thelete originally intend the human creature to appear?
Well as a binary creature, of two genders like themselves. Clear enough. But not as two genders that reproduce meiotically, that is to say, by conjugal reproduction. There are two kinds of reproduction in the natural field of the earth.
Meiotic reproduction, that is to say, a male and a female dog, a male and a female bear, have conjugal sex, combine their genes, and produce offspring. That, of course, is the way that human beings reproduce as well. But, aha, aha, and aha, the plot thickens.
That was not originally the way we were intended to reproduce. Originally we were intended to be of the male and female gender, but not to reproduce conjugally, but rather mitotically. That is to say, we produced our own doubles.
Now you might ask, if we could produce our own doubles, then why would we have to be designed as male and female, why couldn't we just be designed as neutral or androgyne if we're going to reproduce our own doubles by mitosis, then we don't need the organs, for instance, of sexual reproduction?
Well, this is a very good question, and this goes, this episode takes some deep thought, believe me, and I've looked at it long and hard, and I've written a great deal about it on metahistory.org. And I've talked about it and discussed it for ages with my friends and allies in Planetary Tantra. It's one of our favorite subjects, the gender rift.
You know, we live in a world today that has gone insane regarding gender identity and sexuality. Feminism, I mean, look at it, if you can stand to look at anything so ugly and its proponents, who are unspeakably ugly.
Feminism has wrecked the relation between the sexes. It has done horrific damage to healthy and sane and natural heterosexual relationships. While I'm not going into a rant about this topic, just let me say that the restoration of the gender binary is part of correction.
So the worse it gets, the closer it comes to the moment of correction. And in correction, the best and the worst happen at the same moment. But certainly, the human species is reaching a threshold in regard to gender identity and the destruction of the gender binary through the promotion of this transsexual, transgender insanity, and so forth and so on.
Like I say, I'm not going to go into a rave about that right now, but the point here is that this episode in the narrative about the separation of the sexes is the deep background of problems in sexuality that we face in the world today.
One of the things that you will learn about Gnostic intel, and particular about the Sophianic narrative, is that it is a vast mythological story, but at the same time it is extremely relevant to particular and specific issues in life today.
So, it's really enjoyable to know the myth, because the better you learn it and the more deeply you live it, the better able you are to know what's going on with the confusion and insanity in the world today. It's medicine, it's planetary medicine, but you have to know the origin of the medicine so that it can work on you as it is intended to do. Tak!
So, we've considered at some length the A-anomaly, production of the Archons, the B-anomaly, the sharing of the template that has separated the gender binary into two parts. There's a lot more in that story, a lot more, very, very fascinating story of how that plays out. And now we come to the notes for talk 41, the present talk, the third part.
There you see I refer to an article called, “The True Anarchy of Life on Earth”, and I bring your attention to the opening citation, which is taken from “On the Origin of the World”, one of the cosmological texts from Nag Hammadi.
It describes a momentous event in pre-terrestrial evolution, confrontation between the Aeonic mother and the Archons who she produced by accident, by an anomaly. The setting of the confrontation is the region of the galactic arms in immediate proximity to M42, the Orion Nebula, where the anthropic template is embedded, etc. etc.
I give the citation in full because I'd like to bring your attention to a particular expression in that passage. Quote, this is the Aeon Sophia speaking to the Archons, okay? Picture that for breakfast, okay?
“At the consummation of your work when you have achieved the worst you can do against humanity, the entire defect of Archontic illusion exposed in the light of truth will be abolished. And that illusion will be as if it had never been."
Now, did you hear that last phrase in the same way that I hear it? The entire illusion will be as if it had never been. What does that syntax suggest to you? Is there something in that syntax that reminds you of something?
Well, I venture to say that that syntax reminds me of common descriptions of the Mandela Effect. Very commonly it goes like this. Oh! Volkswagen ornament, a V on top, a double V below, and they used to be joined in a single piece of metal. They used to be joined in a single seamless icon.
Now there's a gap between the upper V and the lower double V. So what do people say now, who see the Volkswagen emblem with a gap, and who remember it as always having been that way? Compared to those like myself, who remember it as having had a gap, but now, the gap is gone as if it had never been there in the first place.
This syntax, as if it had never been, is actually being repeated today in real time thousands and thousands of times by people spontaneously who are following the Mandela effect.
This is what? Is this a prediction? Is this an intimation? I would say it's an intimation contained within the surviving Gnostic materials of what the world now knows as the Mandela effect.
Certain phenomena, certain objects, certain words of dialogue, certain names, are being abolished in such a way that there is no memory of them ever having been otherwise in the past. Now right now, that phenomenon of mnemonic anomaly, let's call it the mnemonic anomaly of the Mandela effect, right now, so far, what, seven, eight years into it, appears to be kind of innocuous and trivial.
So, what difference does it make how Looney Tunes was spelled? And if Looney Tunes is spelled with two O's today or with a U-N, what difference does it make? And what difference does it make if there are some people who remember it as having been another way, where others say, well, no, it's the way it is now, and that's the way it always has been, as if it had never been any other way.
Do you see what I'm getting at? This repetitive syntax, this repetitive surging over and over again through your NLP, due to the effect of this phenomenon, is beginning to register an event, but the event hasn’t happened yet. What we have are the trivial or banal precursors of the event.
I mean, it's one thing to say, Tony the Tiger, you know, used to have a black nose and now he's got an orange nose. I don't even know if that's a genuine Mandela effect, because there are, unfortunately, many cases of people inventing spurious effects just for the sake of to keep the game going.
But let's just say it was so. Who cares if Tony the Tiger on the cover of a frosted flakes cereal box had a black nose? Who cares as if it's as if it had never been a black nose?
But when you get to other events, when you get to events in human history, decisive events, and the Mandela Effect begins to manifest in these decisive events, that's when it's really getting tread, not only in the human mind, but it's getting tread in the historical narrative of the human species, and that's where she's going.
She wants to go to the historical narrative with the Mandela effect. However, I can advise you that she hasn't gone there yet. That's why the JFK four-seater, two-seater case is spurious and cannot be resolved from identification of true residue.
She's not changing the JFK event, what would be the point? If she's going to change the JFK event, how about not having JFK assassinated at all? That would be a real change. Then there would be a group of people living in a world where JFK had never been assassinated, and the consequences of that historical narrative would be lived out today, and another group of people who would be living in the world where it happened as it is remembered.
She's not going to change the number of people in the car, that's insignificant. But the fact that that case is getting a lot of discussion points to the direction that she's going to take with the Mandela Effect. We're just not ready to go there yet. She'll know when we're ready. How will she know?
Because she's following this channel, okay? I swear, I mean, I had to say it, you know, it's obvious, isn't it? She's following the decoding of the signal because it's interactive. She's not going to take you deeper into the operation of the signal until you have a command of how it currently works. Okay. So anyway, all that's a little bit off-message, so let me conclude in the next 10 minutes by coming back to the main theme of my riff.
ABC, factor C in the anomalies, I call coalescence. You could also call it co-emergence. It's a term that refers to the fact that the luminous plasmatic body of the star goddess Sophia coalesced into the natural elements of the earth. She became the earth and her organic light is in fact present within the earth.
The true Lucifer is Sophia simply because Sophia brings light, the organic light of the galactic core to the earth. Now here again in planetary Tantra and in the practice of gathering and applying Gnostic Intel, we use certain terminology, and this terminology is a pleasure to use.
You know, if you were studying genetics, then you would know what is a haploid and a diploid in the operation of meiosis, meiotic reproduction. In the operations of the chromosomes, you would know what is a haploid form and a diploid form. And you would use these terms easily with familiarity and with pleasure.
So, here's a term we use to describe the coalescence of Aeonic plasma with the natural elements of the material world, material imminence. The Aeon Sophia is in material imminence in the earth. She's imminent here.
That means that she is alive and not awake, in the strict sense of being awake, she's dreaming the earth. The earth is her dream, it's her dream body. Now this is a really, really important piece of Gnostic intel to take on board. And I ask you to consider this very carefully.
Everyone knows the experience of dreaming. Animals dream, dogs, cats dream, human beings dream. What happens when you dream? Oh, you're out on a lake and you're rowing and a beautiful group of swans glides by. This is the dream that you had.
In that dream, you're in the boat, and you have a dream body. People have written books about this, “A Dream Body” by Arnold Mindell. The dream body is the body you have in a dream. And there are two ways that you can be conscious of your dream body.
One of them is the normal dream, which is not lucid, and the other is the lucid dream in which you take command of your dream body. Right? Everyone knows the difference. Almost everyone has had the experience of lucid dreaming.
Now turn your attention to the situation of your Divine Mother, the star goddess Sophia. The earth is her dreaming body. Just as the body you experience acting and moving in a dream is your dreaming body, therefore she is in a dream. You only have your dream body when you're in a dream. When you're awake, you walk around in your physical body, your normal body. Clear enough?
Then why don't I say that the material earth, the natural world, the planet, whatever shape may be, is the normal material body of the goddess? Many people say that, but that's not correct. No, it's her dream body. It's not her material waking body.
So, if she is dreaming, then she is experiencing life, she is experiencing the story of the child she created, the events and activities in the life story of humanity through her dream body. And, just like a human being has the opportunity to go into lucid dreaming, well that's what she's doing.
She's lucidly dreaming the earth, but she's not waking up, because were she to wake up, then the earth would not be able to be what it is anymore, because the earth is sustained by her dreaming power. This is something that you understand when you get into the dynamics of divine imagination.
I suggested a little bit about that somewhere along in the previous talk, I think. So for right now, to cut to the chase and conclude this massive riff, which is probably driving you all up the wall, what shall I do? How can I conclude in a simplific and elegant manner?
Well how about this? Here's a passage from “Not in His Image”, Chapter 9, “Schools for Co-evolution”, in the section called “Shakti and Sophia”.
"Tantric teachings, which are fully compatible with European and Levantine Gnosis, explain how Shakti-Sophia could turn into the earth and still remain what she is in cosmic terms.
‘When moved to create, the great power of Meghaladinimus of the Gnostics issues from the depths of being and becomes mind and matter whilst remaining what she ever was’. That’s a quote from Sir John Woodruff.
‘This statement epitomizes the Sophia mythos and confirms that Shakti-Sophia is the Godhead of nature. She is both the mother of nature and nature itself’.”
So I use the term primary substance body, to refer to Sophia as a galactic Aeon, and I refer to planetary body to refer to her material imminence. But, of course, you must understand, in the initiated sense, you now may come to understand that her body is a dream body, the earth is to her as your dream body in sleep is to you.
The goddess Sophia turns into the earth, morphing into the physical elements of the solid planet, secreting the fluid and aerial elements of the atmosphere from her own substance, which is the organic light.
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest of them all? Magic mirror on the wall, who's the one with true recall? Well, who's the fairest of them all? What's the fairest sight in the world? I've said this before.
It was the sight of that luminosity witnessed by the initiates in the ancient mysteries of pagan Europe. Noxema, that which is pretty by night, because it's more easily observed by night. It's a material imminence like foam. It does not radiate through space, but it permeates material mass.
The whole mass of the planet floats in her mass-free organic light. Remember what I said about the organic light that floats at the center of the galaxy, and in fact, because the hub floats, the whole pinwheel galaxy floats, even though it weighs inconceivable tons and tons. It floats. Why?
Because the pinwheel arms are mounted on a vortex of light that has infinite density and zero mass. And this is a very great fact, and I assure you, speaking to you today, John Lash, the Gnostic teacher, that it can and will be confirmed what I am saying.
I tell you this, and this is an intimate thing to tell you. This is very, very intimate. It goes to the heart of the secret of the mysteries. But I tell you on the basis of direct experience in ecstatic trance, which is Gnosis, but what I tell you can and shall be confirmed, I am certain, by the new science that will emerge through the super-learning event.
So I'm going to leave it at that right now. I don't want to run this whole riff into the ground. And I will close off these three talks, which represent a unit, and now move back to specific instances of the Mandela effect and decode some more pieces of the overall puzzle picture.
So I'll go back to the specifics from here on out. But in these three talks, well, there you have it, you know. If you want it, there it is. You can begin to delve into the narrative, learn it, reflect on it, enjoy it, relate it to others, make it your own. It's really exciting.
The best story on earth is what? It's the story about the earth. And there's only one story, one true story to every planet. So that's my final word today. And until the next time, may your attention be rewarded by the truth.