#28 - MED - Mythophrenic fuge, cartoon clues, analysis of a three piece cluster

---

Hello again, this is JLL with Gnostic Intel on the Internet. I'm reaching out to you on April 15th, 2017. And in this upload, I'm going to demonstrate a mythophrenic fugue.

And to do so, I'm going to refer to cartoon clues in the array of Mandela signals. And in particular I’m going to analyze one three-piece cluster. Now bear in mind that when you engage in contemplation of these Mandela effect signals along the lines I'm proposing, along the lines of a Gnostic approach, then it's always helpful to use the analogy of the jigsaw puzzle.

Now I'll show in some later talk, if I can remind myself to do so, that the jigsaw puzzle is not the ultimate analogy for understanding the situation of the divine experiment on this planet. So it doesn't apply to the divine experiment as such, but it does apply to the investigation of the Mandela Effect very neatly and very nicely.

And you know there is a principle of NLP called NLP anchoring. When you are actually playing with the neuro-linguistic programming circuits of your own mind, when you are exploring and navigating through your own neural circuitry, it is helpful to anchor that exercise in some manner. There are various ways to do that and the way that I'm proposing here is to put before you, your mind, always, the image of the table with the jigsaw puzzle.

You have the puzzle framed in, you have the corners inserted, and you have clusters developing inside the frame, and then outside the frame, let's say on the right-hand side, you have the heap of pieces that have not yet been brought into the frame to be placed and located in various clusters. Among the clusters within the frame, the clue arrays, as you might call them, of the Mandela effect, some clusters consist of a number of pieces more than others.

So the minimum cluster, there are single pieces, and we can consider them too. There are the minimal clusters of two or three pieces, and then there are the major clusters. So there is a major cluster sitting here on the table. There is a major collection of puzzle pieces of Mandela signals waiting for your consideration. Oh yes indeed. But for right now I'm going to use a three-piece cluster to demonstrate how to handle a mythophrenic fugue.

So you see in the written notes on the tracking page, and this is tracking page number three already, the definition of what a fugue is, and I refer there to the wrong way to do a mythophrenic fugue. Now I'm not going to waste time on giving a demonstration of a wrong way, but there are many examples and if I find a suitable excerpt somewhere on the internet I'll attach it, I'll post it in the tracking page when I find it.

Remember that mantic is the skill of divination. Spirituality is out, mantic is in. Mantic is really just simply the skill of free associating through symbols, references, names, phonemes, allusions, clues, but free associating in a steady, balanced, and directed manner, not chaotically veering here and there, making wild links and suppositions that proliferate in all directions.

In fact, and this is always helpful to return to the analogy of the crime scene, well, what a detective does on a crime scene basically is free associate. On first encounter with the crime scene, the detective finds that the scene is littered with clues and also littered with details that are not clues. So how do you know when you walk into a house where a murder has been committed and you see a paperback novel sitting on a table and then near to the couch you see a cell phone, how do you know which of those items, the paperback novel or the cell phone is a valid clue?

Well, you just free associate at the beginning and then you pursue the free association in a methodical way to determine which are the real clues and the genuine clues that will lead to a proof process that will lead to the solution of the crime. And I warn you that in the case of the crime scene of the Mandela effect, the scene is somewhat littered with false clues, there are misleading clues, clues have been planted, there are mistaken clues, and some of the associations that have been made, for instance the association between the source of, the alleged source of the Mandela effect and the Hadron Supercollider are not supportable, they're not sustainable clues and they do not lead to a satisfactory solution by a proof process that any sane person can undertake.

So here we go, enough introductory chatter. I'm going to look at with you, we're all sitting around the jigsaw puzzle together, we all have our hands on the table, I'm going to look at a three-piece cluster, which consists of the name, which is Schultz, spelled either with a T, I believe that is the occluded form, the way that many people remember it, I as well in this case, and then Schultz spelled without a T, which is the current record.

So you see I've used my notation there, the occluded form is in bold, S-C-H-U-L-T-Z, then there's a forward arrow indicating the shift, and then there’s the current form written in capitals, S-C-H-U-L-Z. And that is one single puzzle piece. Connected to that puzzle piece are two other pieces, Lucy, who is a character in the cartoon sequence “Peanuts” that was written by Charles Schulz, and Snoopy, who is another character. Those are the three pieces. Now watch me build a mythophrenic fugue around these three pieces.

And remember, if you visualize a jigsaw puzzle coming together to form the big picture, while you are listening to me run a mythophrenic fugue, that’s the operative term, to run a fuge, or while you are running one yourself, the visualization of the jigsaw analogy is an NLP device that grounds you and keeps you in a sober and balanced state so that you can achieve the fugue successfully. Clear enough?

So look at the Schultz-Schulz piece. That part of this small cluster carries the ping. So the first piece refers to a name change, which is common in the Mandela effects, right? And the name change merely is there to deliver the ping that catches your attention. Oh, was it spelled T? Was it spelled without a T? Oh, I can't remember. Or I thought I remembered it that way. Why do you go into that state? Why does everyone who gives a moment of serious consideration to these effects, in a specific form of name changes, spellings of names, Sally Field, Sally Fields, why do you go into that state? That's the toggle.

She toggles between these two forms of memory in order to get access to your attention. So, don't be stalled at the ping. You have to go further. So, how do we go further in this case? Well, look at the other two pieces that fit into the first piece, the first puzzle piece. What comes to mind is the content of what Charles Schultz created, the comic strip called Peanuts. And who are the characters? Well, there's Charlie Brown, there's the little kid called Linus, and who else? Just free associate on the comic strip.

And what comes up? Well, there's a female character. There's a female character in Peanuts, right? A female character. Principal character. And what is her name? Well, it just happens to be Lucy. So, the puzzle piece Lucy in this three-piece ensemble has a formation, let's say that it has a tongue or tab, that fits into another cluster, which is the Lucy cluster.

I love Lucy. Lucy, you've got some splainin’ to do. Lucy, are you married to Desi Arnez or Desi Arnaz? So here you see an example of the connection of discrete clusters on the Lucy theme. And what about Snoopy? Well, I'll leave Snoopy just for a moment. So, let's go back, let's draw back for a minute and look at these three pieces, Schultz, however you spell it, Lucy, Snoopy. Now remember, the art of mythophrenia is to go into depth with free association, but remain sober and steady as you do so. So how do you do that?

Well, you just ask questions the way any investigating detective would do. You say, well what are the associations of Charles Schultz? I mean, he's an accessory here. Charles Schultz is somehow accessory to the Mandela fact. Would you agree on that? Ah, we have to investigate all leads, don't we? A good detective checks out all possible accessories to the crime. So what happens? What's the easiest thing to do?

Well, of course, what any simpleton can do, if you'll pardon the allusion, is to go to Wikipedia and look up Charles Schulz. And you learn about his life, he was born in Minneapolis, and just read down. And here we go. Hmmm, Charles Schultz was drafted into the United States Army where he served as a staff sergeant on the 20th armored division in Europe as a squad leader on a 50 caliber machine gun team.

His unit saw combat only at the very end of the war. Hmm, the end of the war. Now, Schultz said that he had only one opportunity to fire his machine gun, but forgot to load it. Fortunately, he said, the German soldier he could have fired at willingly surrendered. Now, that's a biographic detail. It's exactly as if you were at a crime scene somewhere in Beverly Hills, and it happened at the house of a rich person who had a pool, and there was some clue on the crime scene that implicated the person who came to maintain the pool, right?

So, the detective in charge of the crime scene, if he's working with a team, says to one of the other agents, well you better go and question so-and-so who was scheduled to clean the pool on that day. Did they come? Did they not come? And so forth. See how it works. The proof process involves a simple act of asking questions and pursuing the associations that arise rather than being led by the associations. Your role is to steer through the associations. That's the Mythophrenic art of Mantic.

And I might add that when you acquire this skill and when you practice it, just like practicing anything else, practicing a musical instrument, practicing tennis, practicing your math, practicing race car driving, whatever. When you practice mythophrenia, you actually are exercising your probative faculty. Remember that term, this is one of the top 10 terms in the Gnostic jargon that you learn in this investigation.

The probative faculty has both a legal sense and a forensic sense. The legal sense means if you're in court and you make an argument, the argument must be probative, it must lead to the proof of something. The forensic sense is that when you are on the crime scene and you investigate the clues, you must be able to choose the valid clues, discard the specious or specious clues or the mistaken or planted clues, and arrive at clues that contribute to a proof of the crime.

So this word probative, I can't emphasize, I can't highlight enough, what is the probative faculty? Snoopy. That's what it is. Are you Snoopy? Do you have the Snoop Dogg capacity to investigate a crime? Are you a bloodhound detective who works from the blood resources of your intelligence and your gut instincts but combines them with the discernment and direction of your rational mind. Are you Snoopy? Can you exercise your probative faculty?

So you see the third piece in this three-piece cluster actually refers to the faculty of solving the crime. Lucy refers to another major cluster and the name which contains the ping, refers to a biographic or hi-story-ial clue. How rich and rewarding is this practice, if you do it correctly, if you stay sober and steady when you run a mythophrenic fugue.

Referring back just as a final observation to the historyial aspect of this particular clue, we look again at the bare bones of the biography of Charles Schulz. Bear in mind that if you're a detective, picture yourself as a detective in the old days with that pad in your hand, right?

So you go out to interrogate, not necessarily a suspect, but someone who could have been, could have known something about the crime, you know, or someone who was accessory to the crime or someone who knew the victim. And you appear in front of that individual and you have your little pad and you write down things and not everything that you write down is going to pan out. But you make observations nonetheless and then later on you use your probative faculty to discern and elucidate the proper course of a proof. It's all about proof, my friends, and you are the proof.

The proof of the Mandela effect is you, but you have to live up to that proof, and there is a high standard for that proof, as I believe I may be demonstrating to you now as this investigation proceeds. So as a final allusion to the historyial component in the clue of Charles Schultz, Wikipedia says, after being discharged in late 1945. Bingo!

Now if you're a detective who has background on the case, you would know that late 1945 sets off a powerful signal. Why is that? Well, the very great fact is the Greek Coptic materials, the main surviving materials of the Gnostic message to humanity, were discovered in a cave in late 1945. That is the Nag Hammadi codices.

So the investigator, which is you, the detective, sitting there with your pad in your hand, would make a little note of that, wouldn't you? That is certainly a connection worth noting, isn't it?

Now there's another connection to note here. Remember that a good detective checks out all leads. You work the evidence as the saying goes. And sometimes allusions or associations arise. Well, they require a bit of attention which might take you away from the main course of proof or they might contribute to that course of proof.

Now, there's no question that to some of you, the name Snoopy fugues into the name Snoop Dogg. After all, Snoopy is a dog in the Peanuts cartoon strip. But Snoop Dogg ain't no regular dog, right?

So when I say, Snoopy, your probative faculty is like a dog, a bloodhound, searching the trail of evidence to arrive at the solution, oddly enough, the association with Snoop Dog comes to mind. Now, how would you handle this in the course of a normal investigation that is being conducted in a proper manner?

Well, one of the detectives, such as myself, would say to you, hey, you should go over and talk to Jennifer over there in the other desk, because some years ago she was involved with a case of some very ugly and nasty things that happened in the genre of gangster rap.

So you go over and talk to Jennifer because she's a diligent detective and she happens to have investigated a crime. Not everyone has the time and the attention to investigate all these crimes. So we specialize in certain crimes and then we consult with each other and we find, how very very interesting. But there seems to be a massive network, almost a conspiratorial nexus that combines all the crimes being committed against humanity that defile and destroy the divine experiment. And one of them is the creation of Gangster Rap.

Now, Gangster Rap has some leading figures, and I don't think I would be out of order if I said that Snoop Dogg was one of them. Well, I remember the first MTV video of Snoop Dogg when he was called Snoop Doggy Dog and when he shape-shifted into a Doberman Pinscher. Do you know what a Doberman Pinscher is?

It's a German dog that was used by tax collectors who were mainly Jews to go and intimidate the normal people when they went to collect taxes from them, which were in fact not for the benefit of the German people as a whole, but they were for the benefit of a parasitical financial vampire that had attached itself to the German economy.

So, the Dobermann Pinscher figured in the first video of Snoop Doggy Dog is an allusion to Germany once again. And so you're talking to Jennifer, because you don't know this. Jennifer knows this because she happened to have been on that case some years ago. And I can tell you what Jennifer would tell you if you were asking her about Snoop Dogg and gangster rap.

If Jennifer were a Gnostic, she would say this to you, and mark my fucking words. Race is not the problem. The problem is about making race a problem. And if you want to understand about making race a problem, as in gangster rap, then go look at the history of gangster rap and see who created gangster rap.

Now I'm not saying that gangster rap slash Snoop Doggy Dogg slash Snoop Dogg is an essential clue in investigating the Mandela effect, but I am saying that it an ancillary clue, ancillary clue. And you can go investigate it and it's a real big wake-up call regarding the problem of race. Tak.

So, does the problem of race come up in this message coming from the planetary logos into the human mind? Absolutely fundamental. Let me ask you this, do you think that if this message is coming from the source that I claim, who is by all valid definitions the mother of the human species, that she would not be concerned, first and foremost, with conflict among the different races of the species. I advise you to closely observe my syntax.

There is but one human species, and it's called the Anthropos in the Greek materials and Rhome, which is the Coptic equivalent to the word Anthropos. It doesn't mean mankind, it means humankind. It incorporates both the male and female Don't you think that that cosmic entity who designed the Anthropos, the human genome, in such a manner that it could proliferate into various races, would be concerned about conflict among those races?

Well there is certainly difference in races, that's a fact. But difference and conflict are not necessarily the same. Difference is a good thing. Difference gives variety to life. Variety is the spice of life. Why would there be conflict among the different races of the human species?

Well, this is a very, very, very difficult question. And yet, here we are at an early stage of the investigation. And what are we seeing? Some of the clues appear to be alluding to race, and not only that, but some of the clues appear to be alluding to the Germanic race. Let's go back and look at the three piece configuration that I’m currently using to run a mythophrenic fuge.

If you look at the historyial component in the life of Charles Schulz, you find that there was an incident that the authors of Wikipedia deemed worth mentioning. A small incident. There he was, poised and ready to machine gun one of those evil German people, those evil Nazis. But because his machine gun was not loaded with peanuts, he couldn't do it. Oh, that's too bad, isn't it? It's too bad that he couldn't have taken out that German who was ready to surrender, because that would mean one less German on the planet and that would be good for everyone, wouldn't it?

Well, it so happens that about 1.2 million Germans surrendered at the end of World War II. Remember, the biography of Schultz refers to his service at the end of the war. And those 1.2 million German soldiers and officers who surrendered became then, technically speaking, prisoners of war who had surrendered. And they were, according to the standards of international law and the Geneva Conventions, they were deserving of the treatment of any prisoners of war, weren't they? And I ask you, how were those 1.2 million German officers who surrendered, like the German officer that Charles Schultz did not kill, how were they treated?

Well, they were massively murdered in the Rhine Meadows death camps in the months immediately following the end of the war. And that is a fact, whether you like it or not. That is a fact for your probative faculty to sniff out and assimilate.

So, in the construction of the proof of the solution of the crime of what is wrong with the divine experiment on earth, these are some of the ancillary and contributing threads of that proof. And hold on, because I can show you that the mythophrenic fugue, which I am operating here, proves its validity by leading to more and more solid evidence. It doesn't lead to red herrings. It doesn't lead to shaggy dogs chasing other shaggy dogs. But it leads probatively to valid and solid evidence.

So look again on that cluster of three jigsaw puzzle pieces. And look at the Lucy piece. Who's Lucy? Well, she's this funny little character, this annoying little character in the Peanuts comic strip. But remember that that puzzle piece of Lucy has a tongue that fits into the groove of another major cluster, which is the Lucille ball, I love Lucy cluster. She's got some splainin’ to do and Lucy does the splainin’.

When you hear me talk what you're hearing is just that, Lucy does the splainin’. That is to say that in mantic, which is true spirituality, where you don't just make a claim to be spiritual, but you prove it by your skills, is a demonstration of lucidity. And lucidity rewards the dopamine circuits and regenerates them from the effect of the Archontic shock to the amygdala. And all this is material. It's all happening in your mind, in your brain. It's all materially happening in your brain as I'm telling you about it.

Alright. Ok. Well that’s just about it for the moment, but may I conclude with a further reference to the three-piece puzzle cluster we're considering. Particularly I want to draw your attention to the moment when you put your left hand on the three piece puzzle cluster of Schultz's Lucy-Snoopy, and you connect that cluster with the larger Lucy cluster. Now, put your attention on the larger Lucy cluster.

Lucille Ball, the comedian, I Love Lucy show. How deep is your love for Lucy? Do you love Lucy? Who is Lucy? Who is the true Lucifer? Well, these are questions that float around like a beautiful cloud of glittering stars in the atmosphere of this investigation. But as my final point, I would just refer you to her husband, Desi Arnez.

Now there's a Mandela shift, right? There is ample residual evidence that his name was Desi Arnez, A-R-N-E-Z. He was, after all, Cuban, and he had a Spanish slash Cubano slash Hispanic name, Arnez.

So you can find residual evidence of a spoken kind. What's that? Someone on a talk show introducing those celebrities of the 50s, the beginning of the era of television. Here is Lucille Ball and her husband, Desi Arnez. But you find that that memory is occluded, and now if you go on Wikipedia, and if you research various channels of reference, you find that his name is Desi Arnaz. Well, is it really?

Is it really Desi Arnaz? Arnaz, arnaz, arnaz, arnaz, mmm, mmm, you get it, right? You pinged, right? But what's the content of this ping? Go for the content of the clue, work the evidence, ok? Well, I have to admit that I have something of a fondness, a sentimental fondness. I can be sentimental, brutal monster that I am. I have a certain sentimental feeling about Latinos. I like salsa, I love their food, I love their culture, I love the vivacity and color, the incredible, magnificent color of Mexico. I love these things, I love those people. I love the racial difference between me and them, and the adventure and the sexual romance of crossing those borders selectively.

I love all that. And I have to tell you that I lived for a long time in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and I don't know about you, but I have never encountered a Spanish, Latino, Cubano, Hispanic name that ends in naz. Have you?

Is it Martinez or Martinez? Is it Chavez or Chavaz? Is it Rodriguez? Is it Hernandez or Hernandaz? I mean, give me a effing break! How is it possible that a person of Cubano-Hispanic lineage could be called Arnaz.

Now, this shift in the name of the partner of Lucille Ball, the Lucid Baal, the radiant Baal, the luminous Baal, the luminous globe, the luminous earth, the true Lucifer, Sophia. This reference to the name change has an irresistible suggested power, doesn't it?

Well, if it's not Nez, which is extremely bizarre because every Spanish name ends in Nez, Martinez, Rodriguez. If it's not Nez, then it's Naz. Well, excuse me Snoopy, but what does Naz say to you? What is the phoneme Naz suggest to you? I rest my case and I leave it at that point to be continued soon and until then.

Speaking, not figuratively, but in a literal sense regarding the delivery of dopamine to your neuro-logical circuits, may your attention be rewarded by the truth.